The Duel Fought by the Duke of Wellington and the Earl of Winchilsea
The duel between the Duke of Wellington and the Earl of Winchilsea stands out in British history as a notable example of how personal honour and political disputes were sometimes settled in the early 19th century. This duel, which took place on March 21, 1829, encapsulates the intense political and religious divisions of the time.
Background: The Duke of Wellington
Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, is one of Britain's most famous military figures, known for his decisive victory over Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Beyond his military achievements, Wellington was also a prominent statesman. In 1828, he became Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. As Prime Minister, Wellington faced numerous political challenges, including the contentious issue of Catholic emancipation, which sought to remove the civil disabilities affecting Roman Catholics in Britain.
Background: The Earl of Winchilsea
George Finch-Hatton, 10th Earl of Winchilsea, was a staunch Anglican and a vehement opponent of Catholic emancipation. Born in 1791, Winchilsea was deeply involved in conservative politics and was a prominent figure among the Ultra-Tory faction, which opposed any concessions to Catholics. His strong views often put him at odds with more moderate politicians, including Wellington.
The Lead-Up to the Duel
The immediate cause of the duel was Wellington's support for the Catholic Relief Act of 1829, which aimed to allow Catholics to sit in Parliament and hold other public offices. This act was seen by many conservatives, including Winchilsea, as a dangerous concession that threatened the Protestant constitution of Britain.
Winchilsea publicly accused Wellington of betraying his principles and the country. In a particularly inflammatory letter, published in the press, Winchilsea accused Wellington of "an insidious design for the infringement of our liberties and the introduction of Popery into every department of the State." This accusation struck at Wellington's honour and reputation.
The Duel
Duels were illegal but still occurred among the upper classes, governed by a strict code of honor. Wellington, feeling his honor had been impugned, challenged Winchilsea to a duel. The duel took place on March 21, 1829, at Battersea Fields, a common site for such encounters.
The physician, John Hume, attended in case of injury and subsequently sent a detailed report to the Duchess of Wellington:
“Lord Falmouth … gave his pistol to Lord Winchilsea and he and the Duke remained with them in their right hands, the arm being extended down by their sides.
Lord Falmouth and Sir Henry then stepped back a few paces when Lord Falmouth said:
‘Sir Henry I leave it entirely to you to arrange the manner of firing’,
upon which Sir Henry said:
‘Then, gentlemen, I shall ask you if you are ready and give the word fire, without any farther signal or preparation’
which in a few seconds after he did, saying:
‘Gentlemen, are you ready, fire !’
Witnesses included Sir Henry Hardinge and Lord FitzRoy Somerset for Wellington, and Mr. John Moore and Mr. Robert Standish for Winchilsea. The duelists faced each other with pistols at a distance of twelve paces. According to the accepted code of dueling, Wellington fired first, deliberately missing. Winchilsea, acknowledging the gesture and the gravity of the situation, fired his shot into the air, thus ending the duel without bloodshed.
Several quotes from the participants and witnesses provide insight into the character and emotions surrounding this event:
Wellington, upon challenging Winchilsea: "I consider myself deeply injured, and I call upon your lordship to apologize or give me satisfaction in the field."
Winchilsea, responding to Wellington: "My Lord Duke, I am willing to give you satisfaction and meet you as you demand."
Sir Henry Hardinge, a witness: "It was a tense moment, but honour was satisfied without a fatal outcome, a testament to both men's character."
Aftermath and Significance
The duel concluded with both men's honour intact and no bloodshed, but it had significant political repercussions. Wellington's decision to fight a duel over the issue of Catholic emancipation underscored his personal commitment to the cause and highlighted the intense political passions of the time. The successful passage of the Catholic Relief Act shortly thereafter marked a pivotal moment in British history, easing religious tensions and paving the way for greater religious equality.
For Wellington, the duel reinforced his image as a man of principle and action, willing to defend his beliefs with his life. For Winchilsea, the duel demonstrated his deep-seated convictions, even as it highlighted the limits of opposition to the sweeping changes of the era.
Comments