Children Behind Bars: Mugshots from Oxford Gaol in the 1870s
The faded black-and-white mugshots of children imprisoned in the 1870s at Oxford Gaol offer a haunting glimpse into a time when justice was rigid, heartless, and indifferent to age. Oxford Gaol, later becoming HMP Oxford, housed children as young as 12, treated with the same severity as adults for minor crimes such as petty theft. These mugshots, frozen in time, tell stories of a brutal justice system that criminalised children who were often driven to steal out of desperation.
Crime, and how to deal with it, was one of the great issues of Victorian Britain. The rise of urbanisation, overcrowding, and poverty during the 19th century meant that juvenile crime became a significant problem. Evidence from the courts and newspaper articles during the first half of the century illustrates how children were often caught up in petty criminality, particularly in crowded places like fairs, marketplaces, and public executions—fertile ground for pickpockets.
One particularly lucrative target was silk handkerchiefs, which had a high resale value and were easy for young thieves to snatch and sell. Many children were arrested for this exact crime, such as William Clarke, aged 17, whose mugshot survives in the Oxford Gaol archives. He was imprisoned for stealing a handkerchief, a crime that, though seemingly trivial, carried severe consequences in Victorian society.
Petty Theft, Harsh Punishment
Jim Westbury, a boy of unknown age, was sentenced to six months of hard labour and five years at a reformatory school for the theft of corn and hay. While his crime may have been small, his punishment was anything but. Six months of hard labour was gruelling and dehumanising, especially for a child, and the five years in a reformatory school aimed to “correct” his behaviour through strict discipline and isolation from his home environment. These long sentences were designed to break children away from what the authorities viewed as the corrupting influences of their families and surroundings.
Alice Dawson, only 13 years old, received seven days of hard labour for stealing an umbrella. The crime was minor, but the punishment was harsh, a reflection of how Victorian society criminalised even the smallest acts of theft. Alice’s mugshot captures the bleakness of her situation, her childhood overshadowed by the severity of the Victorian penal system.
Crowded Streets and Young Thieves
Crowded public events were particularly profitable for young thieves. For example, in 1824, a 15-year-old boy, Joseph Mee, was charged with picking pockets at a public execution at the Old Bailey, an event often crowded with people distracted by the spectacle. The magistrate described Mee as a “hardened and unconcerned” offender, reflecting the disdain with which young criminals were viewed. Mee was not an exception—children regularly exploited such public gatherings.
Similarly, at Greenwich Fair in 1835, Robert Spencer, aged 13, was caught red-handed by a policeman, pulling a handkerchief from the pocket of a gentleman in the crowd. Five years later, in 1840, an 11-year-old boy named Martin Gavan was apprehended after attempting to steal a handkerchief from another gentleman in a crowd drawn to a traffic accident. The prevalence of young pickpockets, especially in bustling public spaces, underscored the desperation and opportunism that often drove children to steal.
Siblings Caught in the System
The story of the Williams brothers, John and Thomas, aged 13 and 14, is particularly poignant. The brothers were sentenced to six months of imprisonment for housebreaking. For two young boys, their punishment would have been daunting. Their mugshots show solemn expressions, faces full of fear and uncertainty. Imprisonment at such a young age would leave a lasting impact on their lives, entangling them further in the criminal justice system rather than rehabilitating them.
Another young offender, 16-year-old Amy Foy, was sentenced to 21 days of hard labour for stealing a bodice. Her crime—stealing an essential item of clothing—was likely driven by poverty, but she was met with the same harsh treatment as adult offenders. Amy’s mugshot reflects the bleakness of her situation, her childhood traded for hard labour in a system indifferent to her age or circumstances.
Then there was 12-year-old Rose Halliday, who was imprisoned for 10 days on the charge of “false pretences”. Her crime remains ambiguous but likely involved deception to obtain food or shelter. Yet, despite her tender age, Rose was sent to gaol—her mugshot capturing a frightened child thrown into a system that did not distinguish between adult and juvenile offenders.
The Slow March Toward Reform
By the early 19th century, juvenile crime was recognised as a significant problem. However, it took time for the legal system to begin treating children differently from adults. In 1847, a small step towards reform was made with the Juvenile Offences Act, which stated that young people under 14 (later raised to 16) should be tried in a special court, rather than alongside adults in criminal court. This was a move towards acknowledging the different circumstances of juvenile offenders, but it was far from a comprehensive solution.
More far-reaching changes came in 1854 with the introduction of Reformatory Schools. These institutions were meant to rehabilitate young offenders by removing them from the “bad influences” of their homes and environments for extended periods—often several years. Although reformatories were intended to steer children away from crime, they were harsh institutions where children endured strict discipline and hard work, more often breaking their spirits than rehabilitating them.
It wasn’t until the end of the century that attitudes towards child offenders began to change significantly. From 1899, children were no longer sent to adult prisons. The recognition that children were not simply “miniature adults” and should not be subjected to the same harsh punishments marked a shift in the treatment of juvenile crime. By the early 20th century, there was a growing emphasis on reform, and efforts were made to rehabilitate rather than punish child offenders.
Comments